Miller v. California

In 1973 Miller had sent out a large number of unrequested advertisments of "adult" film and books. With a 5 to 4 in California's favor Miller was found guilty. I believe that because these mailings from Miller were unrequested, he endangered juveniles to exposures of these adult pictures. And without the conscent of the parents it is breaking the law.

Even with free speech or free press a person should not be allowed to produce explicit content without any regulations. There must be restrictions to a certain point so that juveniles are not exposed to those kinds of materials at young ages. Without these restrictions you allow a person to almost do anything they please that may harm others in the process and allowing an individual from going unpunished.